Archives For Innovation

A few weeks ago I was in Abilene Texas at Abilene Christian University (ACU), which was the first university in the world to hand out iPhones to all its students. This they fall will be giving their students the option of using their mobile technology credit for an iPhone or for an iPad. To stay current some ACU IT staff purchase and experiment with Android tablets to make sure that these devices will work satisfactorily on the university network just in case the occasional student brings one in. Many people speculate that the Android tablets are the only true competition to the iPad so it doesn’t hurt stay up on what devices may also be coming to campus. The Blackbery Playbook is really not even considered as a device to worry about because so few people use or even want them.

What a difference a few weeks make. I am now in Alberta Canada in my new position as the VP Academic of Concordia University College of Alberta and I have been involved in several conversations about the merits of the Blackberry Playbook over the Apple iPad 2. I consider this a moot discussion since the Blackberry Playbook has neither top of mind awareness with more than 82% of people surveyed planning to purchase an iPad compared to 3% planning to purchase a playbook (see above onlinemarkettrend data) nor does it have any market share (3.3% according to Strategy Analysis). RIM advocates may be quick to point out that the iPad market share dropped from 95% to 61% in the past year but that drop was directly due to the fact that it took almost a full year for the wide assortment of Android tablets to come up that now make up 30% of the market. The Blackberry Playbook is at 3.3% which is quite good considering the lack of innovation that RIM has been able to muster with its product line.

Perhaps one of the most significant factors in selecting a tablet is deciding what you plan to do with it…and that means what apps will be available to help you accomplish the desired task. With over a half a million apps in the App store and more than a third of them free the iPad is the clear winner in this category.

If you want to be open for innovation and if you want to bet on what your students will be walking onto campus with then your safer bet is the iPad. Our Concordia Tomorrow strategy emphasizes being student centric–this means we need to know and understand who our students are and what they need. This also includes knowing what they come to campus with. The chances are overwhelming greater that they will be using the iPad or to a lesser extent the Android.

The question of what tablet should one purchase should also be asked with a specific time frame in mind. Any tablet is really a 12 to 18 month device. Whatever you buy today will be replaced in a year to year and a half. The innovation in this space is so significant that these devices will be obsolete much more quickly than PCs or even phones. All hardware companies build in a significant aspect of designed obsolescence into their devices and I would argue that Apple is the best at this. So purchasing and using a Playbook today is fine if that is what you can tether and are prepared to use. Next summer we will be talking about whether one should purchase the iPad 3 or save money on the iPad 2 or perhaps an Android device will have some must have features. I would also be willing to bet on the Android tablets playing a more significant role.

I have my doubts that RIM will be a player in this space. In order to survive they will have to focus on a very small security niche market as many industry writers suggest. It is really too bad. I have used RIM for many years and remember when they were the innovation leader and not the company being displaced by the new disruptive innovation. I started off with the Blackberry 850 and then the 857 shortly after which were the first two devices ever released by RIM so I have a longer history of using the Blackberry then I do with the iPhone. If they truly had a better device I would switch back to RIM in an instant–but they don’t.

It is in everyone’s best interest for the tablet and the smartphone market to have stiff competition from as many vendors as possible. We have lived through over a decade and a half of monopoly with Microsoft and now that we are moving into the post PC era I would hate to be subjected to yet another monopoly.

Is the iPad going to be another classic example of disruptive innovation for the PC in the same way that the PC disrupted the mainframe and mini computer market? It sure seems to be on the right track. The iPad doesn’t offer all the power and functionality of the PC but what it does offer is enough to make people want to use the device in similar yet different ways than the PC. You have the incumbent market leaders (Microsoft, HP, Dell etc.) downplaying the significance of the iPad yet at the same time trying to compete by offering inferior products that don’t really match the power and uniqueness of the iPad.

The PC disruption took many years to really change the landscape of computing but we didn’t have the Internet, social networking and social media that we have today so the accelerated pace that we are seeing with the iPad disruption should not be a surprise. The accelerated pace of disruptive innovation will continue to grow because we are moving from a push to a pull economy. When you consider the millions of apps in the App Store, Apples continued exploitation of the mobile market that it grew with the iPhone, mobility and the mobile market place that Apple created is poised to knock off more than just the likes of Microsoft.

Read the full article…

All the time everywhere ubiquitous access to the internet is what the promise of mobility will bring. When this is fully realized we will really be able to to learn all the time everywhere. Just how far away is this world. That depends on who you talk to… I also think that the notion that only startups and small companies are moving to the cloud is a classic example of established companies ignoring this disruptive innovation.

Read the full article…

Jason Hiner of Tech Republic has been on a bit of an innovation focus of late. I follow Hiner because he looks at technologies impact in a much broader perspective than most people and he has a very pragmatic attitude toward where he believes technology can take society.  I was intrigued by his post regarding Da Vinci and the Theil’s “Twenty Under Twenty” fellowship which provides $100,000 over a two-year period to young people with big ideas to drop out of college and pursue to their dreams. Hiner like many others in IT and the Academy initially scoffed at Theil’s fellowships but upon further reflection and consideration he admits to seeing some merit in encouraging young people to pursue their dreams. The link to Da Vinci brings in the notion that one of history’s greatest innovators did so through observation, trial and error. Da Vinci did not receive a traditional classical education and many people speculate that if had been trained in this way he may not have come up with the ideas that he had.

Like Hiner I am not willing to “throw education under the bus” so quickly and go onto suggest that, if done well, education should actually help to stimulate the creativity and innovation in the Da Vincis of the future. Doing education well means that we move away from focusing on the recipe and regurgitation and standardized testing that is so fundamental to the American system and focus on creating environments in which our learners learn how to learn through “real  world” projects that require the creation and application of innovative solutions. I think it is criminal that if we want real innovation we need move outside of our educational system to allow students to follow their passions and dreams in programs like Thiels.

We need to be doing this within our educational system and I hope to be in a position very soon to start working on the process to start putting innovation into our educational system. This means that our educational system will need to radically change–when you consider the fact that there are so many people calling for this type of change perhaps the timing is right…

Read Jason Hiners post…

 

With so much to do and with so little time finding something that can help you save a few minutes in every day is extremely valuable. Therefore, I am forever in pursuit the the right app, web-app or piece of software that will make me moire efficient. Minute.io is a web-based service that simply enables you to record your meeting minutes, assign tasks/outcomes and then send those task out to meeting participants in an email. The meeting minutes can also be shared through a secret URL.

While these features are enough to entice me to use the service it is the coming or advance features that should make the service even more effective. Being able to send out a custom email with grouped ToDo is one feature that I am looking forward to but I am really looking forward to the integration of this service with my project management tools. If Minute.io will allow me to push my ToDos to Evernote, Things or Getitdone then this service will be even more valuable and could save me even more time. I will be watching this closely….