- Classic thinking outside the box – What would you do? http://t.co/agNLiIE via @48daysteam #
Powered by Twitter Tools
Creating Significant Learning Environments
Powered by Twitter Tools
As we consider how to take mobility to the next level at ACU, I am looking at what we will need to do and have also been considering what may be holding us back. As a result, I have been reviewing some of my older, Diigo links, blog posts and an assortment of books I have previously read dealing with leadership in IT. The following article was originally posted in 2008 which is a long time in terms of the mobility and the Internet but the message that it holds is still relevant today.
In the article IT 2.0: How Changing Technology is Having Big Impacts on Business, the ReadWriteWeb stated:
This next big shift is on the horizon, but you can see it coming. Today, there still may be plenty of businesses employing “classic geeks” in their IT Department, but that’s about to change…
…Instead, tomorrow’s computer “geek” will be a true member of the business team as opposed to the mysterious man behind the curtain who you only notice when something goes wrong. So what does the “new geek” need to know to run tomorrow’s IT Department? An entirely new skill set, as it turns out.
As we grow closer to ubiquity and transparency in our IT infrastructures the need to keep the fans humming and lights flashing may be relegated to the “classic geek”. In contrast the innovative use of IT resources as a competitive advantage within an organization will require a much more digitally and socially savvy individual. This individual will need to understand and grasp the broader perspective of a connected world that includes the following emerging trends:
We need to ask if this new brand of IT leader will, or even can, come out of IT (the ReadWriteWeb author suggests they will be “rare”). Or do we even want him or her to come out of IT? We look to IT to provide reliability and stability, so innovation and creativity are generally not what IT are good at. We want the fans to hum, the lights to flash, and the network packets to flow to the point that we can forget that IT are even there. Perhaps the new IT leaders will come from outside IT and bring with them a much broader understanding of the organization and be able to blend the reliability and stability of IT with the innovation and creativity required to do business in the connected and collaborative world that we are quickly moving to. Perhaps IT 2.0 will bring about an even greater change in IT leadership than what we may initially expect.
Over the past few months I have been teaching two online courses that deal with change and innovation and as I re-read all the course material and work with my students in these course I am continually reminded that change and innovation within an organization is dependent upon leadership. More specifically, I am reminded that leadership or the lack of effective leadership can severely limit innovation. In his book A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix, Edwin Friedman argues that leadership has such a significant impact that:
When creative, imaginative, and self-starting members of any organization are being sabotaged rather than being supported, the poorly differentiated person “at the top” does not have to be in direct contact with the person being undercut. In fact, neither even has to know that the other exists.
Most of us at one point have worked in such an environment, and as I encourage my students to consider Friedman’s writing in the graduate course EDUC 651: Leading Continuous Improvement of Digital Learning I am also convicted that I do not want to be the type of leader in this course who gets in the way of the creative, imaginative, and self-starting learners.
Friedman draws parallels between families and organizations and points to the similarities in the roles of leaders in both places. He argues that leadership in ones family will have a direct correlation to ones leadership in a broader setting so I am further convicted into considering how well I am leading my family.
The exciting part of taking students through ideas like Friedman’s is that I get to reconsider how well I am functioning as a differentiated learner and over the next several weeks I will be reflecting on these thoughts in my blog.
[youtube]cM5A1K6TxxM[/youtube]
This is a good reminder to never give up.
[youtube]lelmXaSibrc[/youtube]
At the 3:00 minute mark of this talk, from the Open Education Conference in May 2009, Gardner Campbell relates trying to introduce faculty to the potential of connected world by comparing to giving out bags of gold.
”It’s as if day after day, I say, ‘I have a bag of gold, would you like a bag of gold?’ and they say, ‘How do you have time for bags of gold?’”
This is a classic example of squandered potential. Thanks Gardner.