Archives For Learning

Power of Learning Environments

A recent trip to Whistler and a visit to the Whistler Air Dome, commonly referred to as the foampit, has reaffirmed the importance and power of learning environments and has caused me to take a more significant stand on the role that the environment and circumstances play in learning. I have been arguing since the mid 90’s that learning is dependent upon the creation of an effective learning environment and the immersion of the learner in that environment. A learning environment can be a classroom, an online course or anywhere for that matter where learning can take place. I have also argued that learning is the responsibility of the learner and that teachers are not able to make a student learn–the best that teachers can do is develop or establish the environment, immerse the student in that environment and then motivate and inspire the learner to take ownership of their learning. When learning takes place a teacher is really just the facilitator who helps the learner navigate the learning environment and process.

Whistler Air Dome – A Significant Learning Environment

So how does a visit to one of the world’s foremost extreme biking destinations reaffirm my faith in learning environments? Consider the following…

My younger son Caleb decided that he would like to learn how to do a backflip on his mountain bike and he knew a visit to the foampit would give him the safest and most pain-free way of mastering this stunt. For those who aren’t familiar with downhill mountain biking and racing, dirt jumping, slopestyle and other forms of extreme biking there is one unfortunate reality that a rider constantly faces. It is not a matter of if one will get hurt, but when and how badly will the rider be injured. So when a rider can work on dangerous stunts like back and front flips, tailwhips, x-overs and more and potentially eliminate or lessen the chance of getting hurt they will jump at the chance (pardon my pun).

Videos and Pictures of Significant Learning

This first video is Caleb’s 5th or 6th attempt at the backflip and the first time he successfully landed the stunt.

Unfortunately, videos do not fully reveal the scale and intensity of the stunts. The starting point for the stunt is a very narrow platform 25 feet above the ground. The ramp that the riders hit goes from flat to completely vertical in just over 6 feet. The acrobatics are taking place approximately 8-12 feet above the foampit and when you add the 6-foot height of the foampit it is not uncommon for a rider to be performing a stunt 14-18 feet above the ground.

The following video and pictures of my older son Levi performing a tailwhip (spinning your bike 360 degrees below you and then landing back on the bike) should provide another perspective of the height and intensity that is required to complete some of these stunts.

In the picture below you can see that Levi is starting to whip the back end of the bike forward while getting his legs out of the way.

Levi’s bike is whipped out and turned 180 degrees–hence the name “tailwhip”

Levi is preparing to get back on the pedals by raising his legs high in the air. All this happens in less than a couple of seconds.

While the blocks of foam significantly lessen the impact, a rider can still get hurt by landing on their bike or hitting the side of the pit or even by landing out of control. Despite the fact, the stunts performed in the foampit can potentially result in pain and injury my boys didn’t hesitate to expand their skills because the alternative of attempting and missing a stunt on the slopes or course would guarantee a significant amount of pain and the potential for a serious injury.

Informal Learning

The foampit environment is designed to enable riders to perform extreme stunts in relative safety. Everything in the environment contributes to helping riders perform stunts that they normally would be afraid to do elsewhere. The ramps and all platforms in the pit area are extreme enough that the average or even experienced cross county cyclist would not be willing to attempt–the environment is only for those riders who are willing to take the risks required to do the extreme stunts.

Peer Instruction & Social Support

Perhaps one of the most interesting aspects of the environment is that outside of two short (4-5 day) bike camps there are no formal instructors or instruction of any kind. Even in the bike camps, the instruction that happens is less formal and really should just be viewed as coaching.

But this doesn’t mean instruction or coaching isn’t happening at all–it does, but it happens informally or as part of the social and peer dynamic of the foampit environment. In the video below you will notice a conversation between my son Caleb on the right and another rider.

You will also notice that other rider is offering tips and is even showing Caleb how to move and Caleb is emulating or imitating those moves. In this environment, more experienced riders readily offer advice and direction. Most riders will comment, encourage and cheer on other riders. Success is shared by the whole group through cheers and other accolades when a rider finally makes a stunt. Peer instruction and support happens on its own with no formal process. The social dynamic is a very significant part of the learning environment and in just less than 3 hours my boys were able to grow their skills substantially.

Over the years we have learned that the downhill mountain biking, dirt jumping, and extreme biking community is highly competitive but it is also very supportive and encouraging. The music, clothes, speech, peer support and mannerism all point to a unique social community and this social community takes care of its own. The social dynamic is a very significant part of the environment that you will find in extreme biking in places like Whistler, the North Shore, and locations that are dedicated to promoting these sports. But the environment as a whole contributes to significant learning. One doesn’t become a championship surfer on the Canadian prairies nor can one become a professional mountain bike racer or slopestyle champion on the prairies.

What will it take to use the power of well-designed learning environments in our traditional educational systems? Can we get there through evolution or revolution?

In the Family Matters blog Kevin East recommends that we regularly tell our children:

1. You are my son/daughter. This states ownership on my part, and identity on theirs…
2. I love you. This is one of those phrases I don’t think I can say enough…
3. I am proud of you. My pride in them is not because of performance, but because they are mine…

My wife passed on this wonderful link and I have been thinking about the importance of these three powerful phrases in building our children’s self worth and identity. I have also been thinking about the role that these positive reinforcements play in establishing an effective learning environment. In my post Quality time is spelled “TIME” I referred to the James Dobson statement “morality, values and beliefs are not taught rather they are caught.” By positively reinforcing your children you are not only affirming their value and self worth you are modelling positive encouragement and motivating your children to do the same. The learning that can happen in this type of environment is not dependent upon rewarding performance or other external factors. The motivation to be the best one can be, which is a never ending learning process, comes from intrinsic factors of confidence, security and assurance.

While intrinsically motivating our own children, or children within our extended family, is part of our responsibilities as parents I suggest it is also part of our responsibility as teachers. Unfortunately, political correctness and other societal norms and conventions prevent us from telling our students that we love them, but we can still let them know that we truly value and respect them. We can let them know that by being our students they will be respected, valued and appreciated. We can also let them know that we are proud of them and by doing so we will have created the foundation for a learning environment that is based on intrinsically motivating our learners to grow and be the best that they can be.

This isn’t just a well meaning platitude. Intrinsically motivating our students to learn is much more effective than that performance based “carrot and stick” methods. If we recall Daniel Pink’s research revealed in his book, Drive, and the video below the carrot and stick are only useful for simple straight forward tasks that require little or no thought. But for tasks that are more complicated and require conceptual and creative thinking (deeper learning) the carrots and sticks do not work. Pink argues that the science shows that people are purpose driven, care about mastery very deeply and want to be self directed.

Seton Hall University is best know for following Abilene Christian University (ACU) into the mobile learning space with their iPad and Android tablet pilots in 2011. Having had the opportunity meet with several Seton Hall faculty at ACU Connected conferences while I was at ACU I know first hand that the user experience and using technology to enhance learning was a top priority for these people at Seton Hall. This is why the Converge article which points to the Seton Halls Windows 8 pilot and the primary reason for giving up on the iPad and Android pilots as device management was so disappointing. The Associate CIO’s statement:

The enterprise deployment and support features just aren’t there in the other two platforms like they’ve existed in Windows for so long.

confirms that when Information Technology (IT) management and deployment issues become the top priority for a platform deployment you can be certain that the users needs, in this case the faculty and students, are no longer the drivers for change. In addition to management issues the article does also points to the institutions desire to run Microsoft’s One Note which only runs on Windows. Once again this is unfortunately and another indicator that IT management needs are driving this move because the free and cloud based application Evernote is not only a viable substitute for One Note it is actually an upgrade.

Having worked in the role of a CIO and other IT management capacities I can appreciate the convenience that working with well established Windows based deployment tools can offer but I need to remind everyone that when it comes to building an effective learning environment the needs of the IT department should not override the needs of the learner. IT should be supporting the learner (which includes the faculty member) and should be striving to provide an infrastructure where the learner can seamlessly do what they need to do with their own iPad, Android or other mobile device. The learner/consumer has spoken by making the iPad the most popular and transformative network device we have seen in the history of information technology. Its popularity is based primarily on the fact that you don’t need the “dark arts” of the IT department to install software or even configure the device to work or you don’t need to take a course to use it–the iPad is intuitive and it just works. While I can’t yet comment on the Windows tablet yet, many years of experience with Windows has confirmed that there is nothing intuitive about Windows and huge IT departments are necessary to support this platform.

The moves that Seton Hall are making are troubling but not that surprising. We have seen Higher Education IT departments influence platform choices in the past. When the early Learning/Course Management Systems (CMS or LMS) were being developed in the late 90’s it didn’t take too long for the management, deployment and support issues to become the drivers of change. When you factor in the consolidation of the LMS industry by companies like Blackboard we now have some of the best “walled gardens” every built that most faculty would much rather not use. The command and control model so useful for IT departments and offered by the Blackboards of the world not only limits innovation and change it limits learning.

In contrast the iPhone, iPad and related IOS devices as well as Android devices that students choose on their own and most often come to school with are simply tools that these leaners have chosen to help enhance their learning. I have repeatedly stated that the best technology is invisible and simply enhances the experience without drawing any attention to itself. The best technology is also the technology that that average person will set up on their own and use on a daily basis. The best technology for higher education is what faculty are willing to use on a daily basis and what they and their students have to chosen to use on their own. The bring your own device (BYOD) model of technology deployment is what the iPad and related IOS devices have established. This is the technology strategy that can enhance learning.

Unfortunately for Seton Hall and many similar institutions issues of command and control will trump user preference and usability.

For another perspective on the perspective of command and control model of technology deployment verses the BYOD model review the SAP Business Innovation article: Will Prosumer Tablets Beat The iPad In The Enterprise?

Jeffery Young from the Chronicle of Higher Education shared an analysis of research conducted by Piazza, a start-up company that manages online discussion forums for thousands of courses, on online interactions among students and professors in 3,600 courses at 545 colleges and universities over a period of 18 months. The data revealed:

  • highest gains in student understanding when discussion was less strictly marked
  • students at highly selective universities are far more likely to ask questions anonymously than are students at other institutions
  • the practice of asking students to post a comment to introduce themselves correlated with more-robust discussions

These finding are no surprise to those of us in the academic community who have been using online discussions to enhance both classroom and online courses. Perhaps now the dataset for this study is large enough to finally appease even the most vehement opponents to online instruction.

Then again…will there ever be enough data and evidence to fully convince the detractors of online and digital learning?

Daphne Koller argues:

maybe we should spend less time at universities filling our students’ minds with content by lecturing at them, and more time igniting their creativity, their imagination and their problem-solving skills by actually talking with them.