Blackboard and Major Publishers Collaboration

If you hold to the notion that learning is all about pushing content to students then you will be excited to hear about Blackboard’s recently announced collaboration with the text book publishers: Cenage, Macmillan, Pearson and John Wiley & Sons.

In contrast if you believe that education needs to move from the passive educational environment of main lecture points, content dumping, rubrics, individual competition and standardized testing to an active educational environment of interactive presentations, critical and analytical thinking, collaboration and meaningful projects then this announcement will actually be viewed as an example of a market leader taking potentially disruptive innovations like online learning and electronic content and deploying them in sustaining ways. History has shown that educational institutions at all levels are too quick to jump on the band wagon and simply accept a sustaining innovation that does little to improve learning.

While companies like Blackboard attempt to hide behing labels like Learning Management Systems (LMS) their products have very little to do with learning and everything to do with course and content management. While there are exceptions on how they are used, CMS like Blackboard, Moodle and the like are primarily used for content delivery, assessment and grades assignment and general course administration. As Jeff Young points out:

For professors, the new links will make it easier to push students’ grades on online quizzes from the publishers’ e-textbook systems to the gradebook they use on the Blackboard system.

Automating testing and grade assignment is not going to do anything to improve learning and the easier we make it to use automated testing and grading the less progress we are making toward truly reforming education. Technology today offeres education so much potential, yet we struggle to move beyond 19th and 20th century thinking and methodologies.

10 IT Skills that Today’s High School Kids Have – Do You?

Randy Muller challenges IT professionals to have the the same level of skill of an average high student student. I would argue that educators, and anyone else involved in preparing our learners for the 21st Century should have most if not all these skills.

The list includes:

  1. Blogging
  2. Linux
  3. Programming
  4. Game Consoles and on-line games
  5. Hardware
  6. Texting
  7. Twitter
  8. Web design & Multimedia
  9. Facebook
  10. Tech Support

OK not everyone needs to program or be a Linux guru but having a fundamental understanding of these disciplines would be very helpful. I also question whether the average high school student is playing with Linux and not every high school kid programs. But everything else on the list makes sense.

If you consider yourself an IT professional or an educator then do your skills match up?

Read the full article…

What we say is not what we do

In the article What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Ebert-May and her five coauthors reveal that after attending a workshop and learning about inquiry-based learning 75% of attendees were not using what they had learned in the workshop but were still using traditional styles of teaching. The study looked at:

1) How learner-centered was the pedagogy that faculty implemented following PD? and,
2) What variables predict teaching practice by faculty following PD? Videotapes of faculty teaching were analyzed using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP), a reliable instrument that defines and assesses learner-centered teaching.

What is preventing these college faculty from implementing student centered learning. Participants in the survey reported:

that having insufficient time was the main impediment to their revising their teaching.

This issue of faculty not having enough time to implement effective teaching strategies keeps on coming up and yet very few people have really explored how we deal with this issue. If faculty need more time to be able to develop effective teaching strategies then what can we do to make this happen? Perhaps we need to look at just how much time traditional instruction takes compared to student centered learning. I know from personal experience that active, inquiry, and project based learning environments will take more time to develop initially but once they are up and running they are much more efficient than traditional methodologies. Perhaps we need to look at our educational systems as a whole and start asking questions that will result in radical change as opposed to looking at ways to improve our current system which many argue is fundamentally flawed.

Is ADHD Really a Learning Disability

A few weeks back I created a short video as part of a digital storytelling workshop and while I initially thought that this was just a proof of concept and would be something that I would return to and improve, I quickly realized that the message that the video tells is something that should be heard so I have put the video in its raw state up on Vimeo. I was moved by a faculty member at ACU who came up to me and indicated that I had provided a valid reason for the use of technology in the learning environment and that there may be students in his class who learn in unconventional ways. Since he thanked me for “opening his eyes” to these types of students I hope that I can open a few more eyes.

I am not the only person who has questions about ADHD and the way that children are treated who have this “condition” or “disability”.

Sir Ken Robinson addresses this issue in the later portion of his TED Talk Bring on the Learning Revolution.

Die Empty

I have taken the the following from Todd Henry as a personal challenge:

“Do you know what the most valuable land in the world is?”…it’s the graveyard, because with all of those people are buried unfulfilled dreams, unwritten novels, masterpieces not created, businesses not started, relationships not reconciled.

We have a choice – die with un-executed dreams or … die empty.

Read the full post…