Archives For Learning

Dr. John Medina, the author of Brain Rules, is a developmental molecular biologist focused on the genes involved in human brain development and the genetics of psychiatric disorders. In Brain Rules Medina shares his lifelong interest in how the brain sciences might influence the way we teach our children and the way we work.

In the following Youtube video at about 4:15 minutes in Medina explains that:

the brain has appears to be have been designed to solve problems related to surviving in an unstable outdoor environment and to do so in near constant motion…If you wanted to design a learning environment that was directly opposed to what the brain was really good at doing you would design something like a modern classroom.

Medina also asserts that if we really want to re-engineer learning environments we are going to have to tear down a few things and start over.

[youtube]IK1nMQq67VI[/youtube]

Medina has an excellent site called “brain rules“that provides and overview of his book. The video clips and related resources are much more polished that the above youtube clip but you have to see Medina in a lecture to appreciate his passion and character.

[youtube]opXKmwg8VQM[/youtube]

Today we call it active learning, student centered, project based learning and many other terms but it incorporates many of the same principles outlined in the film.

the more things change, the more they stay the same

In the past several weeks I have attended several functions in which the speakers talked about their experiences in college. Unfortunately what they said about their experiences was not surprising and not very encouraging.  For example, one individual who retired at age 55 talked about his experience going back to university to get a degree that would help him in a new endeavor. In sharing his challenges of being an adult learner and not being in school for many years, this individual talked about cramming for tests, meaningless assignments and all the work that he had to do which really didn’t appear to have any significance toward the degree he was working toward. While it was disappointing to hear about this individual’s experience it was even more disappointing to listen to the majority of the audience grown in agreement with his experience.

The audience also laughed in agreement with the speaker when he indicated that he was looking for any opportunity to get out of finishing his degree. They also laughed reluctantly when the speaker indicated that he just had to buckle down and “jump through the hoops” to get through his degree. This is an example of an adult learner who is motivated, mature, and responsible enough to know that the degree that he was working towards would enable him to do the things he wanted to do in the future. And yet, he only saw his educational experience as a means to an end – not as an opportunity to learn, grow and to be enriched. As learning theorist and an educator I grimace when I hear these types of stories but I also recall similar frustrations with many of my classes. I also shudder to consider what the average 18 or 19-year-old, who is often less motivated and focused, is thinking about their experiences in college. NSSE scores confirm that many of our students do not believe that they are being engaged or challenged enough.

It doesn’t have to be this way – one’s educational experiences can be so much more. Learning should be an active, dynamic and engaging process in which learners construct new ideas or concepts based on new, current and past knowledge. The making of meaningful connections is key to learning and knowing and this can be very rewarding and motivating. I also know that we need to move from the passive educational environment of main lecture points, rubrics, individual competition and standardized testing to an active learning environment of interactive presentations, critical and analytical thinking, collaboration and meaningful projects.  We (the Academy) have the responsibility to create significant and engaging learning environments to make these types of stories to go away.

Fortunately, teaching & learning is changing and some people are speculating that mobile devices are one good way of fostering engagement and interaction. But what do we mean by engagement or engaging learning?

In her book Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty, Elizabeth R. Barkley defines engagement as a

process and a product that is experience on a continuum and results from the synergistic interaction between motivation and active learning.

In Defining Student Engagement: A Literature Review Adam Fletcher reveals that a consolidated definition suggests that:

Students are engaged when they are attracted to their work, persist in despite challenges and obstacles, and take visible delight in accomplishing their work. Student engagement also refers to a student willingness, need desire and compulsion to participate in, and be successful in the learning process.

Perhaps one of the most significant revelations regarding engagement is that we tend to know what it looks like when students are engaged and equally important when they are not. Just watch any young person playing a video game and you will likely see expressions similar to those in the image below.

In “Engage Me or Enrage Me”: What Today’s Learner’s Demand, Mark Prensky reminds us that most young people have video games, music, movies, extreme sports, social networking and many other activities that are engaging. He also reminds us that these young people aren’t necessary looking for “eye-candy or the wow factor” they are simply looking for a challenging environment in which they can learn to adapt.

Mobile devices themselves really do nothing to foster engagement  but what they do is force educators to think about the learning environment in new ways. Because we can tap into the internet and vast databases of information, anytime and anywhere with mobile technology, we no longer have to focus on “delivering the content” or require our learners to memorize and regurgitate information. We can move beyond the informational aspect of instruction and move into the realm of analysis and critical thinking and have our learners apply this information to genuine and signficant problems and projects.

These tools force us to rethink the classroom and the learning environment as a whole because we are not able to stuff the classroom into the device. We have no choice but to rethink the way we design our classes and our learner’s experiences – the learner not the content becomes the central focus. When you combine this with the fact that these tools give us access to so much information we can now really focus on the learner, engage them, and help them make those significant connections. What an exciting opportunity!

Neil McBride says computer science was populated by mathematicians and physicists but now virtual robots can be created by eight-year olds without needing programming, logic or discrete mathematics skills. Does that mean we have a dying discipline? There is not denying that there is a crisis in University computer science departments. Read the full article to find out why.

In the blog post The future of learning is DIY Harold Jarche states:

With Google you can find most information that you need. YouTube is a quick and easy way to get “learning objects” to the world. Apple gives the essential tools for knowledge workers, and in a nice package. Wikipedia has shown that the wisdom of crowds is just as good as the wisdom of elites. Starbucks gives free-agents and road warriors a place to meet and work. These top brands provide the equivalent of the interstate highway system for the creative age. Jarche argues that the instead of trying to

He concludes with:

If you’re in the learning business, don’t try to build another LMS or portal. Instead, figure out ways that enable DIY. Believe it or not, learners can, and will, do the rest. They already are.

DIY learning is more commonly referred to as informal learning and there are some theorists who argue that over 80% of learning happens informally. Is this something that we as educators should concern ourselves about?

Consider the impact of the following:

There are billions of searches performed on Google each month (and this number is growing)—to whom were these questions addressed B.G. (Before Google)?

[youtube]6ILQrUrEWe8[/youtube]